breakdown of the middle ground.

Why is Miley Cyrus dancing dressed as a bird and shaking it with a girl?

(yeah its just for a second, but it was a zoom in so its definitely there!)

Because it hints at something “chic”

Sigmund Freud really started the whole mass public sexuality conversation back in the 1920’s. In the United States that decade in particular was all about social experimentation. His theories suggested that “people would behave in any manner to satisfy sexual desire…”

Around the time the free love movement of the 1970’s was wrapping up, a new media-generated “wave” came about by means of a “faddish” attention regarding bisexuality. It became chic… As celebrities like David Bowie started coming out as bi, social interest came out too. The term bisexual chic suggests a level of public acknowledgement, while at the same time still falling short of a solid context of what it really means to live with bisexuality as an orientation.

It seems the larger the city, the more prevalent the nightlife scene is, and the more interested women are in enjoying sexual adventures. From the club to the bedroom, music makes you do crazy things…Just like then, the past few years have brought about another wave of taboo freedom, experimentation desires, and people getting in touch with both masculine and feminine sides. And take two, another burst of bisexual celebrity admissions as come forth. The likes of Fergie, Lady Gaga, Mika, Megan Fox, and Duncan James—just for starters! (Notice how a lot of the newly out bisexuals are singers?? Interesting…)


Pages: 1 2

Filed under: bi-sexual, Maddie Banks, Uncategorized, , , , , , ,

Fence sitters not allowed

Are you scared to say you’re bi or something??

As I watched Bravo’s Million Dollar Listing, I was surprised to hear seemingly open bisexual real estate agent, Madison, refer to himself as a “gay” man. This is first time I’ve ever heard him refer to himself as gay verses bisexual…Why does that seem to happen… people that identify as bisexual sometimes have no problem casually saying they are gay, but they don’t casually say they’re straight? And if they’re bisexual by definition shouldn’t they? (lol)

Furthermore, it seems like the race card’s former one drop rule, has resurfaced as something like the one kiss rule.

(keep reading, click here…)

Pages: 1 2

Filed under: bi-sexual, Maddie Banks, , , , , ,

Frustrated, Intrigued, and Questionable

I’m sitting here feeling three things: frustrated, intrigued, and questionable.

I’m frustrated became the guy I’m currently dating is an urber guy’s guy. We’re talking alpha male all the way. This is good in some ways because I have s short attention span, and beta males’ just plan do too much. He’s kind of like a mojito. He is sweet—not a bad boy or anything, but he’s manly enough that no bad boy guy is gonna call him whipped.

It’s just frustrating because he’s also a workaholic. But I dig that because I’m a perfectionist in the workplace myself. It’s these damn sport seasons that are killing me! I swear there is some game going on everything night…hahaha

On to the next topic…I’m intrigued because …

Pages: 1 2

Filed under: bi-sexual, Maddie Banks, , ,

If you love it so much why don’t you marry it?

There’s a comment I haven’t said or heard since the second grade. Yet it seems particularly perfect for what I recently learned about courtesy of BBC.

We’ve all had something that we loved that wasn’t a person. A blankie, a stuffed animal, maybe a favorite book you completely treasure-whatever it may be, we’ve all had something. You love or loved it to a certain degree and it was very important to you (but probably not as important to you as say your boyfriend or wife, or secret lover even). Your feelings of love, attraction, arousal, and commitment are focused on a very real human being.

Brace yourself, and allow me to enlighten you with the revelation that there are people out there (more than you’d think) that consider the mere thought of a relationship with an actual human being to be ludicrous. Human sexuality is interesting and diverse in its own right full of fetishes and what have you. People are into some crazy things, but this takes the cake. The politically correct term for the individual in love with an object or building is Objectum-Sexual. Just as the name suggests I am indeed talking about people who are in love with inanimate objects.

Pages: 1 2

Filed under: bi-sexual, Maddie Banks, , , ,

follow biFACTOR topics on twitter